Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
Because of the approach that benefits from running the
emergency relief program, it cause Harry Hopkin to have a position in the organization
in which he is appointed to be the head in terms of the work’s progress
administration that will not only benefit the organization but also him.
Of course it has, many third world countries require modern technology to grow and flourish. Before the industrial revolution in the United States, many people worked extremely hard to make clothes and create armory but after the revolution, the impact was huge sewing machines came into work, interchangeable parts and etc. we now use technology that we have to help countries that are still developing.
The statement that a perceptual bias is the subjective mechanism through which people evaluate and make sense out of situations is false. Perceptual bias are systematic errors in perceiving others and guide our reactions and thoughts about what we are experiencing.
