What story?i seeing nothing
Some ideas you can use for the beginning of your text are the Tv and the internet give you access to cultures and this is cheaper than traveling; while some ideas you can use for counterarguments are that you need to travel to have some experiences and information on Tv or internet might be incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What does this prompt require you to do?</h3>
In this prompt you are required to write a complete article considering three main points:
- Beginning: Points that support the idea "These days, there is no point in traveling to see the world".
- Middle: Points that contradict the main idea.
- Conclusion: Ideas that wrap up the text.
<h3>What do I write in the beginning section?</h3>
Some ideas and reasons to support the main point or thesis are:
- Traveling is not necessary because through Tv or the Internet you can know about the art, food, music, etc. of many cultures around the world.
- Traveling is not necessary because the Tv and the Internet give you free access to other cultures, this means this is a cheaper way of knowing other cultures.
<h3>What do I write in the middle section?</h3>
Some counterarguments are:
- Travelling gives you unique experiences such as trying local food that are not possible through the Tv or the internet.
- While you can find information on Tv or the internet about a specific culture this information might be inaccurate or far from reality.
<h3>How do I conclude my text?</h3>
To conclude your text restate the main idea, for example you can say even if travelling has some advantages, it is not completely necessary because through Tv and the internet you can know enough about cultures in other regions of the world.
Learn more about text in: brainly.com/question/20393069
Eight degree four minute (Indira point) is southern most latitude of India. Kanyakumari at 8°4′41″N and 37°32′28″E is the southernmost tip of the Indian mainland. Or you also have Google
Answer:
I believe the best answers are:
blank 1 -- C) that has
blank 2 -- A) NO CHANGE
Explanation:
The original sentence, "...the US government has the power to take custody of land when having historical significance or great natural beauty" is a bit ambiguous. Who has historical significance? We assume it is the land. But, in the way it is phrased, it could also be the government. To eliminate such ambiguity, the best option is letter C) that has. It will help determine a certain land can be taken. What land? The one that has historical significance.
As for the sentence, "The designation of a territory as a national park, national monument, or other types of protected area can limit activities," I don't see any reasons for changes. Especially because of the word "other", which needs to be completed by a plural noun - eliminating options B and C. Letter D wouldn't be incorrect, but the transformation of "protected area" into an adjective for "types" is unnecessary. The sentence is perfect the way it is and, therefore, needs NO CHANGE.
