The answer is yes. The triangles are congruent.
I measured them with a ruler and they are the same length.
Hope this helped! c:
6:20=9:30=3:10=18:60=16:160/3=12:40
Step-by-step explanation:
The question requires you to find value of x in the ratios given;
Start with the first pair
6:20 = 9:x
6/20 =9/x
6x=20*9
6x=180
x=180/6=30 ⇒⇒ 6:20 = 9:30
The second pair after replacing the value of x=30 will be
9:30 = x:10
9/30=x/10
90=30x
90/30 =x
3=x⇒⇒ 9:30 = 3:10
The third pair after replacing value of x=3 will be
3:10 =x:60
3/10 =x/60
180=10x
180/10 =x
18=x ⇒⇒ 3:10 = 18:60
The fourth pair after replacing value of x=18 will be;
18:60 = 16:x
18/60 = 16/x
18x=16*60
x= (16*60)/18 =160/3
x= 160/3 ⇒⇒⇒ 18:60 = 16: 160/3
The firth pair after replacing value of x=160/3 will be;
16: 160/3 =12:x
16x= 160/3 *12
16x = 160 * 4
x= (160 *4 )/16
x=40
⇒⇒ 16: 160/3 = 12: 40
Learn More
Ratios and proportions :brainly.com/question/9512748
Keywords : ratio, value of x, proportion
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The mean SAT score is
, we are going to call it \mu since it's the "true" mean
The standard deviation (we are going to call it
) is

Next they draw a random sample of n=70 students, and they got a mean score (denoted by
) of 
The test then boils down to the question if the score of 613 obtained by the students in the sample is statistically bigger that the "true" mean of 600.
- So the Null Hypothesis 
- The alternative would be then the opposite 
The test statistic for this type of test takes the form

and this test statistic follows a normal distribution. This last part is quite important because it will tell us where to look for the critical value. The problem ask for a 0.05 significance level. Looking at the normal distribution table, the critical value that leaves .05% in the upper tail is 1.645.
With this we can then replace the values in the test statistic and compare it to the critical value of 1.645.

<h3>since 2.266>1.645 we can reject the null hypothesis.</h3>
Answer:
Fraction of the original board left = 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the length of the board is = l feet
Marty saws off
of a wooden board.
Length of the board left = l - 
=
feet
He saws off
of the remaining board,
Board left = ![(\frac{4}{5})l-[(\frac{4}{5})l\times (\frac{3}{4})]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%29l-%5B%28%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%29l%5Ctimes%20%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D%29%5D)
= 
=
feet
He finally saws off
rd of the remaining board.
Board left = ![\frac{1}{5}l-[\frac{1}{5}\times \frac{1}{3}]l](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7Dl-%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Dl)
= 
=
feet
Fraction of the original board left = 
= 