Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
Answer:
Engaging in less physical activity.
Explanation:
Health-related behaviors: This refers to practices, activities or personal attributes, and habits that can put at risk or enhance the overall performance of the participants including mental, psycho-social, and physical well-being.
Examples: Physical activity, diet, coping with stressful events, and sleep are the factors that can get affected by health-related behaviors.
Answer: Effective but not efficient
Explanation:
Something is effective if it can help achieve a specific goal, delivering the expected outcome, while something is efficient when it provides the best possible outcome with the least waste of resources.
Something can be effective but not efficient.
Mary´s work is effective because it delivers the best cakes, but inefficient since three cakes get wasted.
Answer:
Had infringed Juliens patent because Gomez machine was the same as that of Julien
Explanation:
Julien was granted a patent for his invention. The patent right given to him means only him has the exclusive right to reproduce or make other machines of the same mechanism type and design.
If Gomez then developed a similar machine that differed in the shape of the mechanism used to drop the seedling into the furrow and Julien sued Gomez for patent infringement then the court most likely found that Gomez had infringed Juliens patent because Gomez machine was the same as that of Julien.