Answer:
I think the answer is of first one.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The doctrine of nullification was coined by Vice President of South Carolina, John C. Calhoun in 1828, by anonymously drafting a pamphlet titled 'South Carolina Exposition and Protest.'
According to the doctrine of nullification, the states had the right to null and void any of federal laws within state limits. In November, 1832, South Carolina adopted the Ordinances of Nullification making the tariff on imported goods null, void, and unconstitutional.
So, the best definition of nullification is in option B. Therefore, option B is correct.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
Answer:
Altruism
Explanation:
Altruism is human characteristic that can make a person make personal sacrifices for the benefits of to others. It tend to make people who have it become selfless and put their own needs beneath the needs of the group.
This can be seen in Parami's behavior.
She most likely would not get any reward from homeless shelter. Even though it took a lot of time, she choose to does it anyway because she know that it will benefit a lot of people.
Answer:
Explanation: Human right would be taken away because the government wouldn't trust us with freedom. People would take freedom to their advantage and break laws. In order to maintain peace they would take away rights.
