1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EleoNora [17]
3 years ago
6

Contingency adduction is the emergence of accurate responding to untrained and non-reinforced stimulus-stimulus relations follow

ing the reinforcement of responses to some stimulus-stimulus relations.
(A) True
(B) False
Social Studies
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: False

Explanation: The statement in the question describes Stimulus Equivalence.

Contingency Adduction occurs when an individual acquires a new behaviour through conditioning and another contingency adds it to its own range of behaviors.  

Stimulus equivalence on the other hand is when more than one different stimuli get the same response.  Similar to the response in a situation where conditioning did not take place, although the response is accurate, it has not been reinforced.

You might be interested in
Before the Constitution could go into effect, __________ of __________ states were required to approve it. A. 5 . . . 7 B. 9 . .
zubka84 [21]
The correct answer is B. I am sure.
9 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Fernando doesn’t cut in line, he raises his hand in class before talking, and stops his car at stop signs on the road. He focuse
Luden [163]

Answer:

Social conventional reasoning

Explanation:

Social conventional reasoning is common among adults and adolescents. This kind of reasoning is based on judging the level of morality of a action by comparing with the expectations or views of the society. an individual's obedience to rules are not based on moral reasoning but based on what the society expects.

Fernando's reasoning is conventional because he focuses on the rules of the society to control his behavior.

4 0
3 years ago
two scientists failed to report unusual findings when they shared from a recent science expriment. Why is this not scientificall
Sedbober [7]

Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)

Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.

reference

Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.

3 0
3 years ago
From what you have learned about the judicial system, why are the states allowed to have differences in laws when it comes to:
shepuryov [24]

Hello,

According to what I have read, this has been happening because every United States state is also a sovereign and independent entity in its own right and is granted the power to create and apply laws, and regulate them according to their needs. In addition, some laws, such as certain voting laws and criminal laws and statutes, tend to be somewhat uniform across states; nevertheless, some areas of law can be very, very different from one state to the next.

8 0
3 years ago
Huge public construction projects, such as the building of the Hoover and Norris dams, required that the government take land be
dimaraw [331]

Answer: <em>Eminent domain</em>

Explanation:

Eminent domain which is also known as land acquisition or compulsory purchase or resumption or expropriation is referred to as the power of a nation or state or provincial government under which they can take private property in order to be utilized for public use. Nowadays, this domain is mostly legislatively delegated to government subdivisions, municipalities, or an individual or corporations.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • For the last week, adam has been sleeping very little, yet still seems full of energy and enthusiasm. his extreme optimism has l
    5·1 answer
  • After being bitten by his neighbor's dog, Miguel experienced fear at the sight of that dog but not at the sight of other dogs. T
    10·1 answer
  • He Spanish who lived and worked in missions often forced Native Americans to
    11·1 answer
  • A man and a woman have two adjoining parcels of land. the man gives the woman a written, revocable, non exclusive right to cross
    14·1 answer
  • What adjective best describes Onoda?
    14·1 answer
  • Alexander Hamilton wanted to increase government support for farming. large armies. manufacturing. state currencies.
    11·2 answers
  • Why is moonlighting then considered as a violation
    7·1 answer
  • Adopt the ways of a group
    5·1 answer
  • Scientists believe that over 3 million people inhabited Memphis during its height * True False
    7·2 answers
  • Write short note about hilly region​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!