Answer:
Kevin will earn the money before than Philip
Philip needs at least 4 weeks
Kevin needs at least 3 weeks
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's call x to the number of weeks
Philip works 6 hours each weekend, which means 6 hours per week, earning $8.75 per hour, which is equivalent to 6*8.75 = $52.5 per week
Philip has already saved $45. Then he needs the next number of weeks:
52.5*x + 45 = 225
x = (225 - 45)/52.5
x = 3.4
Philip needs at least 4 weeks
Kevin works 3 hours per day for 3 days a week, which means 9 hours per week, earning $7.5 per hour, which is equivalent to 9*7.5 = $67.5 per week
Kevin has already saved $30. Then he needs the next number of weeks:
67.5*x + 30 = 225
x = (225 - 30)/67.5
x = 2.9
Kevin needs at least 3 weeks
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x
2
+
x
−
6
=
(
x
+
3
)
(
x
−
2
)
x
2
−
3
x
−
4
=
(
x
−
4
)
(
x
+
1
)
Each of the linear factors occurs precisely once, so the sign of the given rational expression will change at each of the points where one of the linear factors is zero. That is at:
x
=
−
3
,
−
1
,
2
,
4
Note that when
x
is large, the
x
2
terms will dominate the values of the numerator and denominator, making both positive.
Hence the sign of the value of the rational expression in each of the intervals
(
−
∞
,
−
3
)
,
(
−
3
,
−
1
)
,
(
−
1
,
2
)
,
(
2
,
4
)
and
(
4
,
∞
)
follows the pattern
+
−
+
−
+
. Hence the intervals
(
−
3
,
−
1
)
and
(
2
,
4
)
are both part of the solution set.
When
x
=
−
1
or
x
=
4
, the denominator is zero so the rational expression is undefined. Since the numerator is non-zero at those values, the function will have vertical asymptotes at those points (and not satisfy the inequality).
When
x
=
−
3
or
x
=
2
, the numerator is zero and the denominator is non-zero. So the function will be zero and satisfy the inequality at those points.
Hence the solution is:
x
∈
[
−
3
,
−
1
)
∪
[
2
,
4
)
graph{(x^2+x-6)/(x^2-3x-4) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}
It appears that you have here a list of the # of minutes spent each day on HW, and that y ou need to sum up this list to answer the question. Unfortunately I cannot read the last numeral.
The answer (assuming that my guess is correct) would be found as follows:
Total hours spent on HW in one week = (18+20+22+11+19+18+ ?? )
Answer: it will take him 4.5 hours to cover same distance
Step-by-step explanation:
Marathon runner covered the whole distance in 4 hours running at a constant speed of 8.1 km per hour.
Speed = distance / time
Distance = speed×time
Therefore, distance covered by the marathon runner in in 4 hours, running at a speed of 8.1 km per hour is
8.1 × 4 = 32.4 kilometers
if he decreased the speed to 7.2 km per hour, the distance remains 32.4 kilometers. Therefore,
At 7.2 km per hour, the time it would take him to cover the same distance would be
Distance/ speed = 32.4/7.2 = 4.5 hours
<h2>y = 1x + 2</h2><h2>or</h2><h2>y = x + 2</h2><h2 /><h3>1x is the slope and +2 is the y-intercept</h3>
