Y=-8x+240
look honestly im not sure if this is correct but its worth a shot
The difference between Tucker and Karly's take is that Tucker's solution is analytical while Karly's is graphical. But both are correct either way.
For Tucker's solution, let's say at x=-3 the value for y is 4, and at x=3, the value of y is still 4, then the average rate of change or slope is 0. Note that the slope of the curve is Δy/Δx. Since there is no change for Δy, the slope is zero.
For Karly's solution, even if the curve travels high or low but would have the same elevation of x=-3 and x=3, the average rate of change is still zero. It is actually just same with Tucker's but Karly just verbalizes her solution that was observed visually.
Answer: 184 square inches
Step-by-step explanation:
2(bh/2) + bh + bh + bh
( 6) (4) + (6) (10) + (5)(10) + (5) (10)
= 24+ 60+ 50 + 50
= 184 square inches
<span><span>x-4x+12=6
-3x+12=6
-3x+12-12=6-12
-3x=-6
-3x/-3=-6/-3
x=2
Plug (2) in for x in L2 and solve for y:
y=2(2)-6
y=4-6
y=-2
The solution (x,y)=(2,-2)
Check in both equations by substituting (x,y)=(2,-2) and see if it equals out:
L1) (2)-2(-2)=6
2+4=6
6=6 L1 checks out.
L2) (-2)=2(2)-6
-2=4-6
-2=-2 L2 checks out also, so we can say with confidence that the solution is right.
</span></span>
