Answer:
Explanation: Sometimes you don't need an explanation
(a) My mother and I <u>are </u> delighted to see
Answer:
I believe that Santiago is dynamic character in "The old man and the sea"
Explanation:
Santiago is an old fisherman in Cuba who, at the beginning of the book, has not caught anything for eighty-four days. Santiago's quest for the great catch that will save his career. Santiago endures a great struggle with a uncommonly large and noble marlin only to lose the fish to rapacious sharks on his way back to land. Santiago ends with his spirit undefeated.
Remember a dynamic character also undergoes changes throughout the narrative, due to conflicts he encounters on his journey. A dynamic character faces trials and tribulations, and takes time to learn from his encounters, his experiences, and his mistakes, as well as from other characters.
So if by any chance you think I am wrong let me know and also think back to the story and try to figure out what characters in the book face "trials" and how that person learns from his/her mistake :) you will do great I believe in you!!
The things that are bold are hints of what your answer should be :) <3
The correct option is C: Slippery slope. This type of fallacy suggests that a certain or certain events will take place with no real or sufficient evidence to prove so. This is the case, especially with events that seem unlikely to happen given the circumstances. In this example, the reasoning goes like this: if Quentin fails to pass his math test, as a consequence, he will lose the opportunity of going to college and he will have to live in his parent’s basement for the rest of his life. However, the fact that he does not pass this test is not enough evidence that those two situations will actually take place. For example, Quentin may take the test again and try passing it, or if he eventually cannot enter college, he can look for a job that is profitable and that will allow him to become independent and move from his parent’s house, etc.
Answer: y'all's
Explanation: While you might doubt it from how it looks, it is right. You will have to add it due to the possessive factor, as it shows it is somebody's tattoo artist. (I might have interpreted this wrong though.)
