Based on the information that has been given above, it is likely that the information has been stored on Noreen's short term memory. The short term memory is where memories could be stored in a short period of time, it could be determined or seen above as Noreen had saw the cars on the road but could no longer remember their colors as it was stored on her short term memory.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Marginal analysis
Explanation:
Marginal analysis is a technique you can apply when you are comparing some options. We can say this analysis is an examination of the additional benefits of an activity compared to the additional costs incurred by that same activity. Using this technique you can maximize the potential profits.
The additional cost versus the additional benefit of a decision. In this case, Bill and Alma are analyzing if living 10 miles closer to their workplaces ( benefit) is worth the extra $25,000 in the cost of the house(cost). This is marginal analysis.
Answer:
Sometimes our justice system can really surprise us. How can a person sue another individual based on arguments that are known to be false? Shouldn't the courts just say no to this kind of lawsuits?
It's plain common sense that the court would dictate that the agreement should be annulled or rescinded based on the mother's fraud attempt or maybe mutual mistake between Michael Jordan and her. Even if they were both convinced that he was the father, after it was proven that he wasn't, the court shouldn't have even wasted its time (and taxpayers money) with this case.
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Marginal costs refer to the additional expense incurred in the manufacturing of one more unit of a product. It is the incremental cost associated with producing an extra unit of a good.
The formula for calculating marginal cost is,
MC = change in cost/ Change in quantity
in this case:
MC = $1550 - $ 1500
26-25
MC = $50/1
Marginal costs= $50
Answer:
committed the fallacy of avoiding the issue.
Explanation:
The fallacy of avoiding the issue is also called the fallacy of irelevant conclusion or a red herring.
It occurs when an individual avoids dealing with an issue that he has a problem with.
In the given scenario the issue is whether bluegrass is better than Alfa Alfa for cattle in the Midwest.
Instead of Juan to address the issue he is arguing that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is a bloated bureaucracy with too much fat that deserves to be cut in the next federal budget bill.
He is not addressing the main issue