Answer:
Using the attached formula:
exp = log (total/principal) / n * years
exp = log (10,000 / 7,500) / 12 * 20
exp = log (1.3333333333) / 240
exp = 0.1249387366 / 240
exp = 0.000520578069166667
rate = (10^exp -1) * n
rate = (10^0.000520578069166667 -1) * n
rate = 1.00119939400018 -1 * n
rate = .00119939400018 * 12
rate = 0.014392728
OR rate = 1.4392728 % Compounded Monthly
OR rate = 1.448805264762% Compounded Annually
Step-by-step explanation:
Depends on the cost of the carpet
If the carpet costs x dollars per square foot he will pay 225x dollars.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
25%
Step-by-step explanation:
Apparently, we're to assume that anything not spent is saved.
Let Hideo's income be 1. Then Akira's income is 5/8. Akira's expenses are 60% = 3/5 of that value, so ...
Akira's expenses = (3/5)(5/8) = 3/8 . . . . . of Hideo's income
Hideo's expenses are twice this amount, so ...
Hideo's expenses = (2)(3/8) = 3/4 . . . . . of Hideo's income
That means Hideo saves 1 -3/4 = 1/4 = 25/100 = 25% of his income.
Hideo saves 25% of his income.
I think your image for your regression line didn't show up, but judging from what I see, the answer should be:
<span>D) In step 4, Tameka mistakenly based the strength of the association on the slopes.
This is because the strength of the association is not determined by the slope of the regression line, but by how close the data points were to the actual line. The closer the points are to the actual regression line, the stronger the association.
</span>
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
two plus four equals six