Answer:
$4,110 and 12.08%
Explanation:
The computation of the dollar return and the percent return is shown below:
Dollar Return = (Ending Value − Beginning Value) + Income earned
where,
Ending value is
= $126.69 × 300 shares
= $38,007
Beginning value is
= $113.39 × 300 shares
= $34,017
And, the income earned is
= Dividend per share paid × number of shares owed
= $0.40 × 300 shares
= $120
So, the dollar return is
= $38,007 - $34,017 + $120
= $4,110
And, the percentage return is
= (Dollar return ÷ Beginning value) × 100
= ($4,110 ÷ $34,017) × 100
= 12.08%
Answer: Volkswagen invested in Russia because Russia’s economy was growing rapidly and living standards were rising while the level of car ownership was still low. This made Volkswagen believe that the demand for cars would grow quickly.
FDI was preferable because Volkswagen’s competitors were also investing in production facilities in Russia, so they felt that they needed to invest directly to be on the same levels as their rivals.
Metadata may be the term you are looking for.
Answer: TRUE
Explanation: Gross Domestic Product ( GDP) can be described as the market value of all goods and services produced in a country within a particular time period which is usually a year.
The equation for finding GDP is given as -
GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + ( Exports - Imports)
Nominal GDP can be described as the market value of all goods and services produced in a country within a particular time period using current market prices.
Real GDP can be described as the market value of all goods and services produced in a country within a particular time period using base year prices. Using base year prices to calculate real GDP adjusts for inflation.
The type of syllogism being used in the given sentence is a conditional syllogism.
<h3>What is Syllogism?</h3>
This refers to the use of reasoning in order to draw conclusions about something based on two premises.
Hence, we can see that conditional syllogism was used in the given premises and this is because it made use of either-or to show that if the sidewalk was wet, then that means that it must have rained.
This reasoning is faulty because there are different possible reasons for the sidewalk to be wet and not just rainfall.
Read more about syllogism here:
brainly.com/question/361872
