Answer:
1. the imparting or exchanging of information by speaking, writing, or using some other medium.
2. means of sending or receiving information, such as phone lines or computers.
hope it helps!
The Cuban Revolution resulted in overthrowing dictator Fulgencio Batista creating a communist government under Fidel Castro rule from 1953-1959
Based on comparative advantage and the situation described above, <u>the country that would benefit is Canada, while the country would be at a disadvantage in the United States.</u>
<h3>What is Comparative Advantage?</h3>
Comparative Advantage is the economic term used to describe the economy's ability of a company or country to manufacture a specific commodity or service at a cheaper opportunity cost than its trading partners.
Therefore, currently, Canada is known to have many industries in the oil, such as petroleum and natural gas. Therefore, Canada can quickly produce and trade oil at cheaper production costs with the United States.
However, United States' top industry does not include auto part production; therefore, to trade auto parts with Canada would be expensive to the United States.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Canada would benefit, while the United States would be at a disadvantage.
Learn more about Comparative Advantage here: brainly.com/question/7045530
The concept of Non-Collaboration refers to the certainty that only black people can argue and fight for freedom, since they are the oppressed people and since white people are part of a group of oppressors. This concept is important in relation to overcoming certain forms of oppression, because it allows people who are oppressed by the racist system to have the authority to speak and show what is really harmful and maleficent, since they go through it and have priority in the subject they live and know. In other words, the importance of Non-Collaboration is to give voice to the oppressed, without being interrupted by the oppressor.
The "non-racialist" philosophies of Ubuntun and African socialism do not agree with this concept. This is because both maintain the idea that states that “my existence is connected to the existence of the other”, which means, for them that the anti-racist and freedom debate of black people needs the participation of white people, since they are part of of the oppressive racist system. In short, for Ubuntun and African Socialism both the oppressed and the oppressor need to participate in the process of liberating blacks.
I agree with the principle of Non-Collaboration in parts. I believe that when it comes to talking about racism, black people have priority as they are the people who suffer from it. In this case, I believe that whites have no place to speak and should be silent, listen and understand. However, I believe that racism will only be fought with the participation of whites, since they were the ones who created this system and they are the people who maintain it today, so I think it is important that whites also participate in this debate; as a listener and not as a speaker.
Answer:
1, Mexico and Caribbean Islands.
Explanation:
Since we aren't provided with any story or article, but most immigrants coming to the US are Hispanics and Caribbean.
Good luck with your test or hw!