I would start by planning it using a story mountain then putting each part into paragraphs to make it easier.
So the opening would be setting the scene (where the person is, what did they do to be there etc) the second part of build up would be what’s happening (whats happening before the trial) the 3rd part the problem would be the trial the 4th part the resolution would be are they found guilty? Or are they not guilty? Then the 5th part the ending would be what happed after the trial (did they go to prison? Were they let out without charge?) remember to include how they felt throughout the day (did they feel scared/nervous because of the trial, did they feel relieved because they were found not guilty)
No best friends are not. false.
It is what is right for the individual. A moral relativist is a person who believes that their claims are not universal and can change from event to event.
Answer:
foot in the door phenomenon
Explanation:
Foot in the door phenomenon is a persuasion techniques that works/ relies on the size of the request being made. Experiments on this persuasion technique show that if you wish to make someone do a big favour for you, you only have to get them to do a small favour first. The above example illustrates the foot in the door phenomenon where homeowners agree to a large, ugly, unattractive installation of a sign board because they had started off agreeing to have a small one installed first.