Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If we let x be the amount of live bait and y be the amount of natural bait, Then we can come up with the following inequalities;
We are told that John would like to get at least 3 pounds of live bait. At least 3 means 3 or more. Since x represents the amount of live bait, we have;
Moreover,we are informed that;
The store sells live bait for $12 a pound and natural bait for $7 a pound. x pounds of live bait would cost 12x while y pounds of natural bait would cost 7y. The total cost would thus be;
12x + 7y
but John only has a budget of $63. This implies that he can spend $63 at most, thus;
Finally we can have our last inequality as;
<span>it depends how the interest is calculated, but there's not much of a difference
assuming its continuously compouned, you use this formula: A(t)=Pe^(rt), where A is the final amount, P is the initial investment, r is the interest, and t is the time in years
you want to find t such that A(t)=18,600 so 18,600=1000e^(.0675t)
you need to use logarithm to figure it out, take the natural log of both sides
the following properties will come into use:
ln(a*b)=ln(a)+ln(b)
ln(a^b)=bln(a)
ln(e)=1
taking the natural log
ln(18,600)=ln(1000e^(.0675t))
ln(18,600)=ln(1000)+ln(e^.0675t)
ln(18600)=ln(1000) + .0675t
now solve for t: t= (ln(18600)-ln(1000))/.0675
t=43.31</span>
Answer: $20
Step-by-step explanation:
half of 40 is 20.....
Answer:
Matched pairs design
Step-by-step explanation:
Looking at the options;
-It's not a completely randomized design because a randomized design will assign all individuals to a group which in this case it doesn't.
- It's not a randomized block design because randomized block design will group the subjects in question into 2 or more blocks which have a common characteristic and will then randomly assign subjects in each of the blocks.
-It's a matched pair because every individual/subject undergoes measurements both before and after being treated with the drugs.
Thus, the correct option is matched pairs design.
