Answer:
At the most extreme, no attack on Pearl Harbor could have meant no US entering the war, no ships of soldiers pouring over the Atlantic, and no D-Day, all putting 'victory in Europe' in doubt. On the other side of the world, it could have meant no Pacific Theatre and no use of the atomic bomb.
Explanation:
I resulted in a dramatic rise in the level of economic equality and collapse in GDP and industrial output
Snowball was the brain and soul of the animal community. His devotion lies in bettering the intellectual and moral aspects of the animals. He believes in good intentions rather than force as a driving force in the society. He devises a military defense and plans the windmill for the farm’s electricity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Napoleon, on the other hand, was evil and corrupt. With his vicious dogs, he used physical violence and threats to control the farm. He chased Snowball off the farm and sabotaged his image and work. He made Snowball a scapegoat for his failures and never took responsibility.
The name which is given to the idea of actively reading historical material and then interpreting it into your ideas about its thesis and evidence is:
<h3 /><h3>What is Synthesis in Reading?</h3>
This refers to the technique of reading where a person reads an original document and then creates new elements with his own understanding to see them in a new way.
With this in mind, we can see that the process of active reading of a historical material and then making interpretations into one's own ideas about its thesis and evidence is known as synthesis.
Read more about active reading here:
brainly.com/question/501942
