1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
2 years ago
7

I need help with this

History
1 answer:
Alja [10]2 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is C. That Hecuba properly mourned the death of her beloved husband.

Explanation

In the excerpt from Act II of Hamlet a situation is described in which Hecuba surprises Pyrrhus mincing her husband's legs with his sword and her reaction of clamor and grief is "Would have made milch the burning eyes of heaven, And passion in the gods ". According to this scenario, it can be inferred that the extract suggests that Hecuba properly mourned the death of her beloved husband, because once she finds her husband is dead she shows a lot of pain and grief.

You might be interested in
During the medieval period, the Catholic Church:
DanielleElmas [232]
Fact check me before making it your final answer but I'm 75% sure its 1

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best explains why
taurus [48]
The correct answer is b
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The quotient of twice a number and 25
Elza [17]
2x(25) = quotient

hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Many critics believe that the policy of the British government during the Irish Famine A) contributed to food shortages B) ignor
sammy [17]
Many critics believe that the policy of the British government during the Irish Famine: <span>A) contributed to food shortages 
During the Irish Famine, many people suffered due to the food shortage that caused by massive increase in population due to a constant flow of Immigrants from Ireland. The landlords and the wealthy of course kept a massive food supply within their reach and the British Government basically did nothing about it.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
In which respect is a secondary source more helpful than a primary source
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

A secondary source summarizes large amounts of evidence.

Explanation:

Primary sources correspond to “primary literature” and are those that present themselves and are disseminated exactly as they are produced by their authors.  Primary sources are original materials on which other research is based.  This type of source presents the information in its original form, without interpretation, summarization or evaluation by other writers.

On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources for this reason present a series of evidences that support their interpretations. In this sense, secondary sources may be more useful than a primary source.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some reasons for limiting authority
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about Chinese silk is false? Silk was in high demand as a trade good. Silk was made from the c
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Reconstruction Finance Corporation initially affect the Great Depression
    12·1 answer
  • A colony started by means of a land grant issued to pay a debt owed by the king to the Penn family and a place where all religio
    7·1 answer
  • Quien fue Jose Marti
    13·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS AND 5 STARS IF IT IS RIGHT
    13·1 answer
  • Which statements about Saddam Hussein are accurate? Check all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • Which modern democratic principle was influenced by the Greek and roman idea that all citizens should feel responsible for parti
    9·2 answers
  • 5. The State Colonization Law of 1825 played a significant role in the growth of Texas by -
    14·2 answers
  • What led to the case of Marbury v. Madison?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!