Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Woman in both civilizations were expected to serve men.
Okay, fair warning, Math is not my best subject, but I believe the answer is A, -3/2. Hope I'm right
Is this real????????????????????????????????
Catholic church responded to the Reformation through the allowance of Calvinist movement to continue expansion and also agreed to perform services in the vernacular.
Answer : Option D and E
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Catholic Church responded to the Reformation of Protestants by the formation of Council of Trent. the Council of Trent was formed in the year of 1545, the Church opened it for dealing with the problems raised by Martin Luther.
The assembly of high officials formed the Council of Trent, meeting principally in the Northern Italian town of Trent for a period of discontinuity for eighteen years held in 25 sessions.
Luther justification of faith was denied and Doctrine of Merit was affirmed and so the Church got weakened but the Calvinist movement got expansion with services in vernacular was accepted to be performed.
