Answer:
Pretty sure it's C
Step-by-step explanation:
For inverse functions, I do the opposite operation
the only logical inverse function I see working in this expression would be C
divide the 5 from 5x and add the 3
Also, subtract the f(x) on both sides to get the "- y"
so, you get : 5/x + 3 = - y (f(x) is just "y")
The answer is <span>2(–4y + 13) – 3y = –29
Step 1: Express </span><span>x from the second equation
Step 2: Substitute x into the first equation:
The system of equations is:
</span><span>2x – 3y = –29
x + 4y = 13
Step 1:
</span>The second equation is: x + 4y = 13
Rearrange it to get x: x = - 4y + 13
Step 2:
The first equation is: 2x – 3y = –29
The second equation is: x = - 4y + 13
Substitute x from the second equation into the first one:
2(-4y + 13) - 3y = -29
Therefore, the second choice is correct.
The statement is always true because right angles measure 90 degrees and if you add them you get 180 and supplementary angles are angles that add up to 180.
Hope this helps :)
Well basically you just have to chose a number of sides for the side length of the square to be and move those many places to get another vertex of the square. For example if we have (-2,3) and we choose the side lengths to be 4 units than you could move 4 places up, down, left, or right to get the other vertices for the square
Hope that helps :)
