1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NARA [144]
3 years ago
9

Rousseau believed humans were

History
1 answer:
givi [52]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

According to Rousseau, in the state of nature, people tended to be isolated, war was absent, and their desires were minimal and circumscribed (i.e., commensurate with their basic survival needs). People did not have the drive to acquire more possessions. There was plenty to go around, an absence of reliance on others, and no real need for extensive social interaction. However, there did exist an unreflective sympathy and general compassion toward others that was indiscriminate and not based on merits.

You might be interested in
HELP .. I NEED THIS DONE NOW.
Fudgin [204]
1.m
2.b
3.j
4.d
5.a
6.f
7.e
8.g
9.i
10.c
11.l
12.h
13.k
(I’m pretty sure these are right, I know most of them are correct)
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following allowed foreign wives of servicemen to enter the U.S. outside of immigration quotas?
dem82 [27]
It was the "War Brides Act" that allowed foreign wives of servicemen to enter the U.S. outside of immigration quotas, since this was only seen as fair for those who were serving. 
7 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the napoleonic code?
slamgirl [31]
It was the French civil code for governing property.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should all Americans have equal rights and opportunities?
lidiya [134]

People need to believe they have equal social and political rights, else there would be mass protests, revolutions and anarchy. Whether they actually exist in real life is irrelevant here, only the belief matters.

The primary difference in the social structures of humans and animals is the forced imposition of order in human society, leading to a more 'collective' society, instead of the usual 'survival of the fittest/law of the jungle' structure.  

And the concept of equal rights is necessary to achieve this imposition of order.

In my opinion, a human society following 'law of the jungle' would be unsustainable, simply because humans as a species are too weak to survive as individuals. The greatest strength of our species is our mental faculty. This leads to the sum of the parts being greater than the whole. As individuals though, we would fail to harness this strength.

Therefore, equal rights do offer us an evolutionary advantage, since they allow us to cluster together, and grow as a population, which is the only way for us to survive.

5 0
3 years ago
Who do you think would be allies among these different groups struggling over North America? Check all of the boxes that match y
nikitadnepr [17]
C D and E are the sanswes
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What majority of Congress does it take to amend the Constitution?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of these might cause workers to strike?
    12·2 answers
  • Tipos de movimientos poblacionales
    14·1 answer
  • How did Theordore Roosevelt become president?
    14·1 answer
  • How can two different historians come up with different versions of the past
    14·1 answer
  • Charlemagne was known as the "father of Europe.” How does this map help to explain that title?
    9·2 answers
  • Statements about the first navigation act passed in 1651
    6·1 answer
  • 7. Would you like to be a historian who studies colonial history or a person who works at a museum like Old Sturbridge Village?
    11·1 answer
  • What similarity did Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin share?
    5·2 answers
  • List the geographical features that make India so unique. Include plateaus, rivers, mountains, seas, oceans, etc.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!