Answer:
they have similar climate
Explanation:
Answer:
arraignment
Explanation:
Arraignment is legal procedure in which defendant is informed about crimes and charges imposed and charge upon him. Its first step after arresting and bailing phase that defendant come in courtroom and answered about charges.
Answer:
C
Explanation: Which of the following do both Kant and Rawls support?
a) Incorrect. Both Kant and Rawls reject this view of rights. Instead they both believe that rights set limits on what can be done in the name of maximizing overall happiness.
b) Incorrect. Both Kant and Rawls believe that human beings have the capacity for reason/rationality (recall Kant's attempt to derive moral principles from a principle of rationality and Rawls' thought experiment of the original position where individuals are left with little but their rationality).
c) Correct.
d) Incorrect. Kant and Rawls believe the opposite, i.e. they both believe that the right/just is prior to the good in the sense that principles of justice and right are determined/justified independently of any particular notion of the good life and, moreover, limit the range of conceptions of the good that people are allowed to pursue in a political community.
e) Incorrect. Kant and Rawls reject a) and d).
Answer:
a situational attribution
Explanation:
Fritz Heider has introduced the concept of attribution during the 20th century. Fritz Heider argued that there two different types of attribution including situational or external attribution and personal or internal attribution.
Situational attribution: The term situational attribution is also referred to as environmental attribution and is defined as an individual tendency to describe one's or the other person's behavior, an outcome or an event based on the outside factors including luck, circumstances, etc.
In the question above, Caitlin's conclusion best illustrates a situational attribution.