The answer is probably a key word in the lesson material that you are forgetting, and since I have not read your lesson material I can't be sure what the wording is. But all those things have to do with advertising, so best guess is Market exposure or something like that. If that jogs your memory about a key phrase that you learned in the lesson material then go with that though. Goodluck!
Answer:
Ricci vs. DeStefano
Explanation:
This case is a US labor law case that occurred in 2009, where twenty (20) firefighters at the New Haven Fire Department claimed to be discriminated against because they were refused promotion despite the fact that they passed the test.
More noticeably, no blacks and a very small number of Hispanics qualified for the promotion.
The result of the lawsuit was that $2 million was paid to the firefighter plaintiffs and New Haven reestablished the results and promoted 14 out of the 20 plaintiffs. For fees and costs, their attorney Karen Lee Torre was paid $3 million.
Answer: Ask questions, help them, or do something they love
Explanation:
Some of the positive ways of impacting ones family circle is by asking questions, helping other members of our family and by doing something that they love.
We shouldn't be self centered by showing them what we love such as our favorite music, movies, and TV shows. Rather, we should listen to them and give them listening hears and always help them when there is need for our help.
The correct option is D.
$342,000
Regardless if the amount of supplies has not been paid or not, it is still accounted for in the balance sheet. You would have a debit of 342,000 for supplies, credit of supplies payable of 240,000 and a credit to cash for 102,000 assuming that the difference between both amounts was paid for with cash.
Answer: d. any of the choices.
Explanation:
Chaz is not to transfer the duties to a third party if Dolly got into the agreement with Chaz for any of the following;
- If Dolly places special trust in the ability of Chaz to perform the maintenance then that trust should not be broken by transferring the duties to a third party. Dolly went into that contract because they trusted in the abilities of Chaz.
- If Dolly went into the contract due to the personal skills or talents of Chaz, the duties against would be non-transferable. Chaz's skills were the reason the contract was signed, if these skills are not to be used then the contract will be baseless.
- By signing with Chaz, Dolly expects a certain level of performance. If the performance that will be made by a third contracting party is materially different from the one that Dolly would have expected from Chez, the duties will not be transferable.
