Answer:
opinions
Explanation:
opinions can help because where are arguments there are fights
Answer:
A) The two cultures end up sharing traditions and advancements peacefully
Explanation:
Let's go through this by process of elimination.
A) The two cultures end up sharing traditions and advancements peacefully
This would ease the tension and the suspense in the cultural conflict of the story.
B) The narrator's people form an insulated community to preserve their heritage
This would ease the tension, however, the suspense of an attack would create commotion and suspense.
C) The narrator fights to regain the land that once belonged to his people.
This would NOT decrease the cultural conflict in this story.
D) The narrator convinces his people to let go of their traditions and
embrace progress.
This would create tension throughout the people as the narrator attempts to convince them to let go.
<h2><em>I am unsure of the answer, as it could be either A or D, but I would choose option A. </em></h2>
Answer:
Morgan freeman says the "declaration was meant to be spoken rather than simply read" to portrays that when the declaration was published the right thing to do was to follow, support and believe it so to say "spoken" from the heart but rather what happened was the declaration was simply "read" which suggests that it was not treated with value rather read like some common story.
I think its Laertes idk ig im right :/
