Answer:
- boat: 16 mph
- current: 4 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
speed = distance / time
The rate downriver is (60 mi)/(3 h) = 20 mi/h.
The rate upriver is (60 mi)/(5 h) = 12 mi/h.
The rate of the boat in still water is the average of these:
(20 +12)/2 mi/h = 16 mi/h
The rate of the current is the difference between the boat speed and actual speed:
16 mi/h - 12 mi/h = 4 mi/h
105,000 would be the correct answer to your problem.
Answer:
z score Perry 
z score Alice 
Alice had better year in comparison with Perry.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided information.
One year Perry had the lowest ERA of any male pitcher at his school, with an ERA of 3.02. For the males, the mean ERA was 4.206 and the standard deviation was 0.846.
To find z score use the formula.

Here μ=4.206 and σ=0.846



Alice had the lowest ERA of any female pitcher at the school with an ERA of 3.16. For the females, the mean ERA was 4.519 and the standard deviation was 0.789.
Find the z score
where μ=4.519 and σ=0.789



The Perry had an ERA with a z-score is –1.402. The Alice had an ERA with a z-score is –1.722.
It is clear that the z-score value for Perry is greater than the z-score value for Alice. This indicates that Alice had better year in comparison with Perry.
Answer:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression)
- reflection over the y-axis
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion)
- translation left 1 unit
- translation up 3 units
Step-by-step explanation:
These are the transformations of interest:
g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . . vertical scaling (expansion) by a factor of k
g(x) = f(x) +k . . . . vertical translation by k units (upward)
g(x) = f(x/k) . . . . . horizontal expansion by a factor of k. When k < 0, the function is also reflected over the y-axis
g(x) = f(x-k) . . . . . horizontal translation to the right by k units
__
Here, we have ...
g(x) = 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
The vertical and horizontal transformations can be applied in either order, since neither affects the other. If we work left-to-right through the expression for g(x), we can see these transformations have been applied:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression) . . . 1/3f(x)
- reflection over the y-axis . . . 1/3f(-x)
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion) . . . 1/3f(-1/3x)
- translation left 1 unit . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1))
- translation up 3 units . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
The "working" is a matter of matching the form of g(x) to the forms of the different transformations. It is a pattern-matching problem.
The horizontal transformations could also be described as ...
- translation right 1/3 unit . . . f(x -1/3)
- reflection over y and expansion by a factor of 3 . . . f(-1/3x -1/3)
The initial translation in this scenario would be reflected to a translation left 1/3 unit, then the horizontal expansion would turn that into a translation left 1 unit, as described above. Order matters.
3 is 13 more than 10, and 3 is 30% of 10, so 30% im pretty sure