1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
12

Differentiate between judicial review and statutory appeal​

Law
1 answer:
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
4 0

Explanation:

While an appeal focuses on whether the decision itself is correct or incorrect, judicial review focuses on whether the decision maker conformed with statutory or common law powers conferred on the decision maker.

You might be interested in
Is this real I found it about 3 years ago​ on the back it says RL 925
sineoko [7]

Answer:

Does it have like any other markings on like 14 kt 24 kt 10 kt?

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the most direct method for combating rainforest deforestation?
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

The answer to this question is C. rehabilitation.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Antitrust laws promote efficiency by: creating regulations. reducing monopoly power. reducing information asymmetries. allowing
Kruka [31]

Answer: 1. reducing monopoly power.

2. breaking up natural monopolies.

Explanation: Antitrust laws were also referred to as competition laws. These laws are developed by the US government to protect the consumers from unethical or ill-legal business practices. These laws ensures the existence of fair competition in the economy of open-market.

1. The antitrust law will reduce the monopoly power as a result of which the competition will increase. Due to competition the production of goods and services will also increase. This will enhance the efficiencies.

2. The antitrust law will break up the natural monopoly. So the benefit of natural monopoly will reduce and average cost of production will increase. This will create inefficiencies.  

4 0
4 years ago
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

As used in these standards, “prosecutor” means any attorney, regardless of agency, title, or full or part-time assignment, who acts as an attorney to investigate or prosecute criminal cases or who provides legal advice regarding a criminal matter to government lawyers, agents, or offices participating in the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases. These Standards are intended to apply in any context in which a lawyer would reasonably understand that a criminal prosecution could result.

These Standards are intended to provide guidance for the professional conduct and performance of prosecutors. They are written and intended to be entirely consistent with the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and are not intended to modify a prosecutor's obligations under applicable rules, statutes, or the constitution. They are aspirational or describe “best practices,” and are not intended to serve as the basis for the imposition of professional discipline, to create substantive or procedural rights for accused or convicted persons, to create a standard of care for civil liability, or to serve as a predicate for a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss a charge. For purposes of consistency, these Standards sometimes include language taken from the Model Rules of Professional Conduct; but the Standards often address conduct or provide details beyond that governed by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. No inconsistency is ever intended; and in any case a lawyer should always read and comply with the rules of professional conduct and other authorities that are binding in the specific jurisdiction or matter, including choice of law principles that may regulate the lawyer’s ethical conduct.

Because the Standards for Criminal Justice are aspirational, the words “should” or “should not” are used in these Standards, rather than mandatory phrases such as “shall” or “shall not,” to describe the conduct of lawyers that is expected or recommended under these Standards. The Standards are not intended to suggest any lesser standard of conduct than may be required by applicable mandatory rules, statutes, or other binding authorities.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/ for more info

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
From the early days of this country, the general presumption in criminal law has been that behavior is a
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

Bad behavior or innapropriate behavior

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe three earlier types of corporal punishment used to correct offenders, and identify the goals of each.
    9·1 answer
  • What is it called when citizens give up there rights but get back protection from government?
    6·2 answers
  • How do I cancel my monthly subscription
    12·2 answers
  • Which is an example of symbolic interactionism?
    14·2 answers
  • Voice: sometimes his behavior annoys me.​
    12·1 answer
  • Prior to entering an enter section a driver should cheak the
    6·1 answer
  • A jazz singer was contracted to perform for two nights at a nightclub .four days before he was to appear , the club burned to th
    14·1 answer
  • Use the rules of inference and replacement to construct a proof..<br> philosophy: college
    10·1 answer
  • Describe an economic problem the government in America is trying to solve. What solution to this public policy issue do you thin
    8·1 answer
  • Which attribute defines a socially disorganized neighborhood?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!