Answer:
It's a little difficult to see the difference between the finch 1 and finch 2 population lines, but their trends should match those of the food. This answer is assuming the finch 1 population aligns with the seeds line and the finch two population lines up with the fruit line: <u>The finch 1 population has a beak adapted to eating seeds and the finch 2 population has a beak better adapted to eating fruit</u>
Explanation:
Since we are given data for both the food source and the finch population, the answer will most likely reflect that. Therefore eliminating choices A (disease) and C (feathers). Again, this answer is assuming the finch 1 population aligns with the seeds line and the finch two population lines up with the fruit line. The lines for the finch population will match with the availability of food, so less seeds mean less finch 1 and when the amount of seeds rise up you can see the population of finch 1 also rises.
An antibiotic ointment could be used for a woman's vagina lips in case of tearing in natural childbirth which can happen if the baby is say a little too large for the opening as long as not too large to require a caesarian.
A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
It might be C but dont quote me on that
