Hopefully this works as an example x
There is no denying the fact that the government has to take care of several pressing issues such as poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. This is particularly true in the case of developing countries. However, this does not mean that the government should not spend money on arts.
Art represents a country and its heritage. Take, for instance, the case of India. The country is famous for its exquisitely sculpted monuments, temples and palaces. They were the handiwork of artists of the bygone era. Even today, the temples and monuments at Konark, Rajasthan and Madurai attract tens of thousands of local and international tourists. They showcase the rich cultural history of the country and elevate its status. If the kings of those times had not patronised art and artists we would not have these monuments to show off now. Not only the monuments but other forms of art like dance and music also need to be preserved for future generations. Otherwise, we will lose touch with our roots.
Government funding is crucial for the existence of arts. Art itself does not generate much revenue and hence artists, especially the lesser-known ones, have to struggle to make a living. This deters many of them from pursuing art as a profession. The only way to kindle their passion is to provide them financial assistance. By doing so, the government can not only protect its artists from starvation but also preserve his cultural legacy. Spending money on arts is also a way of generating money and creating employment. For example, if the government conducts art festivals and exhibitions, they will attract a lot of visitors and return the investment. Such events also provide employment to a number of people. Thus, it is evident that spending on arts is not a waste of resources.
To conclude, it is important for the government to invest in various social and economic welfare schemes. Likewise, it is equally important to invest in arts.
Answer:
It is the relief in the tomb by the name of Stele of Amenemhat I. It shows the deceased and his family, and it is used to provide protection for the dead.
Explanation:
<u>-What type of sculpture is this tomb decoration? </u>
- This is a relief, a type of sculpture tied to the background and carved in order to pop up from it.
<u>- Why was this type of sculpture common among Egyptian tombs?</u>
- The reliefs are done as part of the wall, and they can’t be taken down and stolen. The Egyptian tombs were often raided as it was known they include goodness provided for the dead. The reliefs could not be taken, and they served as the constant symbolic protection that was sure to stay.
<u>- What is the title of the sculpture?</u>
- The tilte of it is Stele of Amenemhat I.
<u>- What is the subject matter of the sculpture?</u>
- The subject shown on the relief is the everyday family life of the deceased. Amenemhat is embraced by his mother (who is also dead) and (living) father, while his sister stands beside expressing love for him by touching her heart. It is a scene of love and protection, depicting the tenderness family feels for the deceased son.
<u>- What was the purpose of tomb decorations?</u>
- It is meant to provide wellness for the deceased in the afterlife. We can see the food and drinks carved and painted, which is presented to ensure that the person in question has enough to consume on the other side. It also is there to provide joy and safety, and to memorize the life of the loved one.
Music a global phenomenon. People around the world appreciates music even though they don't understand the lyrics (because of the language). Music is a universal language. It makes people unite. For example, the recent famous song from Disney called "Let it Go". People around the world made different translations just to sing that song. I also agree to what sanaybrown posted, it's a way people express their feelings.
<em></em>
<em>
</em>Answer:
$0.38
<em>:</em>
<em>First we need to convert pounds to ounces</em>
<em></em>
<em>1 pound = 16 ounces</em>
<em></em>
<em>Thus 16 ounces cost $3</em>
<em></em>
<em>If a portion requires two ounces of butter, we must find out the cost of these 2 ounces, knowing that 16 ounces cost $ 3</em>
<em></em>
<em>ounces cost
</em>
<em>16 -- $3
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>2 -- x
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>To find the cost x:
</em>
<em>rounding to the nearest cent: $0.38</em>
Answer:
here's the math hope it helps
