Answer:
9%
Explanation:
WACC is the average cost of capital of the firm based on the weightage of the debt and weightage of the equity multiplied to their respective costs.
According to WACC formula
WACC = ( Cost of common stock x Weightage of common stock ) + ( Cost of preferred stock x Weightage of preferred stock ) + ( Cost of debt ( 1- t) x Weightage of debt )
As WACC is calculated using Market values.
Company Value = 100%
Value of Debt = 28%
Value of Debt = 100% - 28% = 72%
WACC = ( 10.54% x 72% ) + ( 5.27% x 28% )
WACC = 7.59% + 1.48% = 9.07% = 9% (rounded off)
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
We know that there is a inverse relationship between the price of a good and its quantity demanded.
Relative inelastic demand refers to the demand where percentage change in the quantity demanded is relatively smaller than the percentage change in price of the good.
Relative inelastic demand curve is a demand curve which is relatively steeper in shape but not perfectly inelastic or vertical.
Answer:
$207000 is the sales revenue for the year.
Explanation:
The given situation is:
Sales Revenue 100%
Cost Of Goods sold <u> 60% </u>
Profit Margin 40%
Now we neither have sales revenue figure nor the profit margin figures but we can calculate cost of goods sold from the following formula:
Cost Of Goods Sold = Opening Inventory + Purchases - Closing Inventory
By putting values we have:
Cost Of Goods Sold = $54,000 + $109,800 - $39,600
Cost Of Goods Sold = $124,200
Now cost of goods sold is 60% which means if we want to go at 100% we will divide with the percentage at which we are standing (60%) and multiply with the percentage which we want to calculate (Sales is 100%).
Sales revenue = Cost of goods sold * 100% / 60%
Sales revenue = $124200 * 100% / 60% = $207,000
<span>DELETE because it makes sense you welcome </span>
Team bonding through the subjugation of junior members is not valid. Junior members should be encouraged by the senior members to strive for the team, not belittled or humiliated in the process. Different people assume comradery in different ways, some through degradation or laughter, and others through positivity and cohesiveness, but subjugation and humiliation should never be a factor when building teams, especially in today’s society since we live in such a diverse culture in this country. If an organization relied on humiliating banter in order to form a collective unit, then it shows that the organization is less cohesive and reflects poor management and leadership skills within the organization.
