Answer:
d. Emeralda from " Clean as a Whilte Co." runs over patty Pedestrain in the dealership's parking lot.
Explanation:
Liability is the degree to which a person is responsible for injury that happens to another party in a lawsuit. Peter owns an auto dealership. Peter hires Cara as a receptionist, Ben as a salesperson, Stacy as a mechanic, and "Clean as a Whistle Co." as cleaners.
Peter will be least liable if Emralda from "Clean as a Whistle Co." runs over Patty I'm the dealership's parking lot.
This is because Peter hired the company as a seperate entity from the cleaning company employees. The conduct of employees from the cleaning company is responsibility of "Clean as a Whistle Co."
Answer:
65000 units
Explanation:
Given:
Expected sales of product W in April = 60000 units
Expected sales of product W in May = 75000 units
Expected sales of product W in June = 70000 units
Inventory in hand at the end of each month = 40% of the next month's expected sale
Inventory expected at the end of the April = 40% of the expected sales in May
or
Inventory expected at the end of the April = 0.4 × 75000 = 30000 units
Therefore, the total units required in April = Expected sales of product W in April + Inventory expected at the end of the April
or
the total units required in April = 60000 + 30000 = 90000 units
Now,
Excessive production in March (inventory) = 25000 units
Hence, the units required to be produced in April = the total units required in April - Excessive production in March (inventory)
or
the units required to be produced in April = 90000 - 25000 = 65000 units
Answer:
The journal entry for the issuance of the common stock is shown below:
Explanation:
Cash A/c.............................................Dr $33,000
Common Stock A/c........................Cr $30
Paid in Capital A/c...........................Cr $32,970
Working Notes:
Cash = Number of shares × Issue Price
= 3,000 × $11
= $33,000
Common Stock = Number of Shares × Par Value
= 3,000 × $0.01
= $30
Paid in Capital = Cash - Common stock
= $33,000 - 30
= $32,970
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If there is a more number of compounding periods within a year so it would result into the higher price of future value for lump sum investment in year 0 but the case would be adverse with the present value i.e there is less amount in the present value with regard to lumpsum amount i.e to be recieved in the future date
Hence, the given statement is true
