Keynesian or pump priming philosophy, In other words, money should be held in the working class of the people. Their spending would set the pace for the economy because it would then determine how businesses and companies would set new demands and needs for the new hired workers. This was controversial and interesting because it was exactly the opposite of the previous Republican model of "Trickle Down economics"
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the people ultimately being in charge of their government. </span></span>
Answer:
The governmental presence in the colonies were usually designed to serve the interest of the colonizers. Let's examine Spanish and British empire as a comparison.
Spanish Empire's main purpose of creating colonies was to spread Christianity. British Empire on the other hand did it purely for their economic interest/
Spanish Empire will install a government within the colony that forced the local to abandon their original language, culture, and religion so it will be easier for them to learn about Christianity. This was the reason why ex-Spanish Colonies now speak Spanish and mostly Catholics. The government installed by the British empires on the other hand mostly acted as intermediary that treated the colonies as a smaller business entities.
Marxism had found its place in Russian politics because it<span> "appealed to the working class in Russia, as well as the intelligentsia, and their frustration with the elite upper class by promising a fairer system of economics." In addition, Marxism mainly describes class reformations which among its pioneer is Karl Marx. </span>
Answer:
there peace is present and business development increase
