Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:
The answer is working memory.
Explanation:
Working memory is a memory system which allows a person to process and manipulate information. Although it's sometimes used interchangeably with <u>short-term memory</u>, the difference is that working memory allows the person to use the information in a practical way<u>,</u> while short-term memory simply stores it. For example, a mathematical formula stored in the short-term memory will be used by working memory when solving a problem in a test.
Answer:
“The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.” The freedom of the press, protected by the First Amendment, is critical to a democracy in which the government is accountable to the people. A free media functions as a watchdog that can investigate and report on government wrongdoing.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Explanation:
hope this helps
