I going to have to say the answer is A
Answer:
The appropriate approach is "Zeus : mythology".
Explanation:
The line of reasoning has always been about the personality as well as the subject matter under which it's recognized.
- Furthermore, the soundtrack would be something he did, with perhaps the exception of someone throughout the argument, including the multiple personalities discussed earlier.
- Zeus, on another hand, would be indeed not real and is therefore strongly correlated with legends in almost the similar way that a fair number is affiliated mostly with melodrama.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The evolution of dogs is a scientific topic that has a lot of scientific research backing it up. So, the most reliable source would be one that is revised by people well versed in this area of knowledge. An academic paper revised by peers is an official, trustworthy source.
There are many valid points in Orwell's essay with which we agree. The main points relating to politics and English language are follows,
I agree that the people are now paying less attention to the grammar of English, people are finding ways to simplify the daily communication.
They paying less attention to the grammar makes English look a different language than what it was initially.
I disagree when Orwell's when he writes about the meaning less words, he explains that some words used in stories are meaning less to the reader, while as a story book reader fan I think that each word or set of words ease the imaging of story.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24374672
Answer:
I think it is B because of what it say about being a inspiration and all that stuff about him
