1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetllana [295]
3 years ago
6

What is the process of working for a client whose opponent is on the opposite side called?

Law
1 answer:
vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D.Adversarial

Explanation:

You might be interested in
a 60 kg ingot of brass consists of zinc and copper. 25% of the ingot consists of zinc. how many kilograms of copper does the ing
barxatty [35]

Answer: 45kg

Explanation:

Since 25% of the ingot consists of zinc, it implies that (100 - 25) = 75% of copper is contained in the ingot.

We then calculate 75% of 60kg to get the amount of kilograms of copper that the ingot of brass contain​. This will be:

= 75% × 60

= 75/100 × 60

= 0.75 × 60

= 45kg

4 0
3 years ago
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
vfiekz [6]

Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members

Other biased sources include the following:

  • Political party members of the President,
  • Previous schools the current President attended,
  • Family of the current President
  • The political party the President belonged to,
  • The special assistants to the current President, etc.

The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239

3 0
2 years ago
PLS HURRY What countries were allied in World War I and opposed in World War II? Russia and Germany Germany and Britain France a
Dovator [93]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were a coalition of countries led by France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, the major European powers were divided between the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. The Triple Entente was made up of France, Britain, and Russia. The Triple Alliance was originally composed of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy, but Italy remained neutral in 1914. As the war progressed, each coalition added new members. Japan joined the Entente in 1914 and after proclaiming its neutrality at the beginning of the war, Italy also joined the Entente in 1915. The term "Allies" became more widely used than "Entente", although the Principal Allies of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and Japan were sometimes known also as Quintuple Entente.[1] The colonies administered by the countries that fought for the allies were also part of the Entente Powers such as British India, French Indochina, and Japanese Korea.

The United States joined in 1917 (the same year in which Russia withdrew from the conflict) as an "associated power" rather than an official ally. Other "associated members" included Serbia, Belgium, Montenegro, Asir, Nejd and Hasa, Portugal, Romania, Hejaz, Panama, Cuba, Greece, China, Siam (now Thailand), Brazil, Armenia, Luxembourg, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Liberia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Honduras.[2] The treaties signed at the Paris Peace Conference recognised Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the United States as 'the Principal Allied and Associated.

3 0
2 years ago
Module #3 of this course is devoted to the common law. what is the common law?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Common law is law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes.

Explanation:

Common law is law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes. ... Though most common law is found at the state level, there is a limited body of federal common law--that is, rules created and applied by federal courts absent any controlling federal statute.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the selections below was a belief of the Founding Fathers that mirrored John Locke's idea of the social contract?
zhannawk [14.2K]
It was a human being that lived on our solar system
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • There is only one judge in a trial court. True or false?
    14·2 answers
  • After the initial walk-through, who is now in authority of the crime scene, securing the safety of both people and crime
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a procedural defense but can be used to prove one’s innocence?
    7·1 answer
  • How do you delete this
    6·1 answer
  • Do you know any good websites to practice law? Please write them down with a link.
    9·1 answer
  • Which example represents a reserved power?
    10·1 answer
  • Landry owned and operated a car service station in a small village. He sold the station to Harold, agreeing not to open another
    7·1 answer
  • Who prosecuted Ernesto Miranda
    6·2 answers
  • Question 4<br> A Identify at least three maior costs of owning a vehicle throughout a year.
    14·1 answer
  • Hi so if someone backstabs me what do I do
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!