1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
3 years ago
6

Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?

Law
1 answer:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Escobedo hizo declaraciones que luego se usaron contra él, lo que resultó en que fuera declarado culpable. Aunque la Corte Suprema de Illinois confirmó la condena, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos revocó la condena en parte porque la policía violó los derechos de Escobedo bajo la Sexta Enmienda.

You might be interested in
Without prejudice means
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

Explanation:

Prejudice means: preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.

So without prejudice means: without any preconceived opinion that is not based.

5 0
2 years ago
Assume a sitting president issues an executive order. Identify 2-3 questions you would want to ask to determine the impact of th
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

hlo chutiye kesa hai

Explanation:

bta de.n yrr

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a new technology that makes correctional<br> institutions safer?
lawyer [7]

Answer:

it is jail

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Difference between ritualism and retreatism​
Westkost [7]

Answer:

Retreatism refers to rejection of both the goals and the means, and rebellion occurs when individuals reject both and then create new goals and means to pursue. According to Merton's theory, ritualism occurs when a person rejects the normative goals of their society but nonetheless continues to participate in the means of attaining them.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1) What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof
Bess [88]

Answer:

People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.

No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John left his home state of Missouri early one afternoon to drive to New Mexico. Eventually the sun set, but John continued on.
    6·1 answer
  • True or False: How quickly other drugs reach the bloodstream varies depending upon how the drug is put into the system and the t
    11·1 answer
  • Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped
    14·1 answer
  • Summarize articles 4-6 of the constitution
    13·1 answer
  • Suppose a suspect refuses to consent to a warrantless search of his home in connection with a robbery investigation. Police then
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • Which unit of the military has 90% failure rate for their training recruits ?
    6·1 answer
  • How does DNA testing help forensic science and the criminal justice system? What are some of the challenges in analyzing this ki
    8·1 answer
  • You are employed by Riverdale Industries "Riverdale." Riverdale manufactures and sells replacement car parts for vintage automob
    13·1 answer
  • The press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!