1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
3 years ago
6

Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?

Law
1 answer:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Escobedo hizo declaraciones que luego se usaron contra él, lo que resultó en que fuera declarado culpable. Aunque la Corte Suprema de Illinois confirmó la condena, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos revocó la condena en parte porque la policía violó los derechos de Escobedo bajo la Sexta Enmienda.

You might be interested in
5.) What is the current legal status of sentencing guidelines?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).

Explanation: :)

7 0
2 years ago
PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPL
Ivan

Answer:

dude just search it up im sure its on Google, you dont have to ask it either im sure somebody asked it with and answer already

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The US supreme court has to hear every case before the Court under federal law.<br> True or false?
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
False because they can reject what ever they want
8 0
3 years ago
Why are Part I Offenses treated<br> differently than other crimes?
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Part 1 offenses include the violent crimes of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter.

7 0
3 years ago
The policy that kept the united states out of the war for three years was called
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

The neutrality policy.

Explanation:

When the war blowed, President Wilson declared that the United States will follow a strict neutrality policy where it wouldn´t ally with other countries. This policy lasted three years.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Power to interpret the law belongs to the Supreme Court and lower courts
    7·1 answer
  • Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
    7·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of cross-examination during a trial?
    6·1 answer
  • if i asked a question its to help me, or help others so.. BRAINLY. WHY. DO. YOU. KEEP. DELETING. ALL. OF. MY. QUESTIONS.
    13·2 answers
  • Meet u+p for a m e e t if you want to join!<br> 967 064 3684<br> 6vB2B1
    8·1 answer
  • How do you judge a person?
    7·2 answers
  • When a contract is completed to the satisfaction of both parties, it is said to
    9·1 answer
  • Any research that does not have the characteristics and requirements of experimental research is called
    10·1 answer
  • سيا
    15·1 answer
  • when firms from wealthy countries trade with firms from poor countries, they benefit from economic____.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!