1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
3 years ago
6

Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?

Law
1 answer:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Escobedo hizo declaraciones que luego se usaron contra él, lo que resultó en que fuera declarado culpable. Aunque la Corte Suprema de Illinois confirmó la condena, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos revocó la condena en parte porque la policía violó los derechos de Escobedo bajo la Sexta Enmienda.

You might be interested in
What can you expect when you get stopped by a cop.
MrMuchimi

Answer:

if a police car is following you with its siren swearing or emergency lights flashing pull over to the right quickly but safely and come to a complete stop in a safe place.

Explanation:

this is a true fact about life when you're driving

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
-- In the past, nonmanagerial employees were viewed as employees who
umka21 [38]

Answer D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is Friday night, and you and your friends are going to the movies. Two of your friends are female and three of your friends a
Akimi4 [234]
I actually don’t understand this question
6 0
3 years ago
How do i get rid of my mother please i
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

i dunno

Explanation:

how does one get -202 points?

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5.) What is the current legal status of sentencing guidelines?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).

Explanation: :)

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The __________ is the federal statute requiring most records in agency files to be accessible to the public. a. APA b. Governmen
    12·1 answer
  • Would you be willing to be a whistle blower? On what type of issue would you blow the whistle? Inflated overtime submitted on a
    10·1 answer
  • The US Supreme Court ruled the Erdman Act was unConstitutional because Select one: a. it interfered in due process of law b. all
    15·1 answer
  • If anyone want to RP email me at sheaneemathis2006 at g mail .com
    13·2 answers
  • What core value is common to all U.S. Military services? *
    11·2 answers
  • What are 8 examples of behaviors that can lead to aggressive driving and the ways that you can avoid them?
    7·1 answer
  • write a ONE page essay on the definition of hazardous material and be sure to list some of the hazardous materials that law enfo
    14·1 answer
  • Paano mo maipapakita ang pagiging tapat
    5·1 answer
  • cowper summarizes _____ by saying that we will have 100 years of progress in the next 25 years and 20,000 years of progress in t
    5·1 answer
  • in which of the following areas did regional interests and perspectives have the least impact on national policy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!