Answer: because she can’t speak or write English, she is “disqualified” to become an U.S. citizen.
Explanation: to become a U.S. citizen it is required to be able to read, write, speak English and have knowledge and an understanding of U.S. history and government (civics)
Answer:
The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, and the defendant. Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. First, even before a defendant appears before a judge, prosecutors may agree, as part of a plea agreement, to recommend a lower sentence or to charge a less serious crime in exchange for the defendant's cooperation.
Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
Creo que es A pero no estoy segura
Explanation:
