I would say D.
Killing is never the answer, so not A.
Trapping and transporting them may seem good, but it would only mess up the environment that they left from because they have been there for so long, the environment must somehow rely on them, so not B.
Not C either because you only encourage the foxes to eat more animals on your land.
Therefore, D works best for this question.
Answer: The correct answer is : c. it was better for trade and easier to defend
Explanation: Constantinople was the ideal place for the capital because it was surrounded by water on three sides and was the intersection of Europe and Asia. Constantinople was key to prosperity because it linked east and west through maritime and land trade routes. Constantinople was in the center of the Bosporus Strait, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
