1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vaselesa [24]
3 years ago
15

During the 1970’s did it really matter who was President or was it a doomed conclusion from the start? What were the 2 main caus

es of all the problems?
History
1 answer:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Let us assume that Jimmy Carter is an intelligent, decent, hardworking man. Assume, moreover, that he has appointed to his cabinet and sub-cabinet many men and women who are experienced and dedicated. How, then, can a president—certainly no less mentally alert than most past presidents—with many advisers of high caliber, produce such an undistinguished presidency?

It’s a puzzlement. And it cannot be accounted for by most of the explanations currently in vogue, such as: Carter’s an outsider who really doesn’t understand the levers of national governance; or Carter surrounds himself with a “Georgia Mafia” whose weaknesses are the same as his own; or Carter is a bad manager who hasn’t been able to sort out decisions that a president must make from those that should be settled at lower levels; or Congress is so uncontrollable that it will not allow any president to exercise the reins of leadership; or the bureaucracy has grown beyond the span of presidential control; or many of the nation’s problem’s are highly intractable; or even all these reasons taken together—although there is truth in all.

I would like to put forward another theory: The root of the problem is that Jimmy Carter is the first Process President in American history.

“Process President”—using a definition by Aaron Wildavsky and Jack Knott—means that Carter places “greater emphasis on methods, procedures and instruments for making policy than on the content of policy itself.”

Carter is an activist. He wants to do things. Yet his campaign statements should have warned us that save for the human rights thrust in foreign policy, his passion in government is for how things are done, rather than what should be done.

He believes that if the process is good the product will be good. In other words, if he sets up a procedure for making policy that is open, comprehensive (his favorite word), and involves good people, whatever comes out of this pipeline will be acceptable (within certain budgetary limits).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The mass movement of people to the cities was called:
Ipatiy [6.2K]
The answer is urbanization.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind appeal does the author use to open the president's speech? What is its effect?
Naddika [18.5K]
Without the speech I would say its a logical appeal
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe Shay's rebellion. Why was it important?
luda_lava [24]
The main cause of shays rebellion where the large amount of debt the farmers where experiencing in the 1780s. another cause is the lack of economic crisis laws in massachusetts. Some other causes where because of bad harvests economic depression and high taxes threating farmers with the loss of their farms.
7 0
3 years ago
What was the civilizing mission of westerners
Afina-wow [57]
1.to abolish bad culture
2.to construct infrastructure
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under this act a case involving a contractor based in Washington DC disputing building regulations in the us
Llana [10]
<span>#1) Under this act a case involving a contractor based in Washington DC disputing building regulations in the us?
<span>
Answer: I believe that it was under the Contract Disputes Act. This act established the procedures and requirements for asserting and resolving claims subject to the Act. It also provides payment of interest on contractor's claims, certification of contractor claims, and Civil penalty for contractor claims that are fraudulent or based on a misrepresentation of fact.

I hope it helps, Regards.</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the reasons for imperialism
    14·1 answer
  • What do you need to know
    15·2 answers
  • In what ways did aristotle influence alexander
    10·1 answer
  • Which Soviet Union action was a response to the establishment of the North Atlantic treaty organization?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe how the Monuments Act demonstrated Roosevelt's dedication to conservation.
    12·2 answers
  • Which religious were practiced in the Mughal empire
    14·2 answers
  • Why are historians able to rely on well-known museums for accurate information about the past?
    10·1 answer
  • What protections were built into the Charter of the Medieval Town of Lorris, France for the tenant or homeowner?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASEE HELP ASAP
    8·1 answer
  • Is it okay to be black and not support BLM?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!