I cannot reach a meaningful solution from the given information. To prove that S was always true, you would have to prove that N was always false. To prove that N was always false you would have to prove that L was always false. For the statement (L ^ T) -> K to be true, you only need K to be true, so L can be either true or false.
Therefore, because of the aforementioned knowledge, I do not believe that you can prove S to be true.
Answer:
1.0
Step-by-step explanation:
The 6 is bigger than 5, so that bups the number up to 1.0.
Answers:
5.) Yes it is, you add each one to itself to get the next number
6.) Yes, you subtract 5 from each number
7.) yes, you add 1.50 to each number
8.) Yes, you add 50 to each number
9.) No, they do not follow a pattern
10) Yes, you divide by 5 every time.
