Can you write your choices for us please ?
(b) By function and product departmentalization bases are likely being used at hp.
- Organizing activities into departments is a component of departmentalizing. The division of labor creates specialists, who need coordination. This coordination is made simpler by the division of professionals into departments.
- Employees are divided into groups or departments by a system of rules known as departmentalization in an organizational structure. These divisions work together to fulfill duties as instructed by their own leadership. On large or complicated projects, different departments might work together.
- HP has a decentralized organizational structure, which allows top management to concentrate more on big choices by giving intermediate and lower-level managers within the organization responsibility for daily operations and decision-making.
To know more about departmentalization visit:
https://brainly.in/question/49544593
#SPJ4
Answer:
Other countries might have products/resources your country doesn't
will engage in a good relationship with the country
It also has economic advantages since you don't have to hurt your land to find the product or resources
During the era of slavery in the United States, the education of African Americans, enslaved and free, was often discouraged, except for religious instruction, and eventually made illegal in many of the Southern states. It was believed that literacy was a threat to the institution of slavery. First, literacy facilitated knowledge about the successful slave revolution in Haiti of 1791–1804, the end of slavery in the British Empire in 1833, and the writings of abolitionists. Secondly, literacy allowed or potentially allowed slaves better access to information about the Underground Railroad and other routes to freedom.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
