Nick Cannon is 40 years old and Mariah is 50
Answer:
Supreme Court justices need a healthy respect for past precedents. But sometimes, precedent is so bad it simply has to be overturned.
The court did just that last month in the case of Knick v. Township of Scott. The court delivered a victory for champions of property rights by overturning a 1985 precedent that had blocked property rights cases from federal courts.
This overturning of an older decision sparked a vigorous public debate. Two Supreme Court justices staked out opposing positions: Elena Kagan warned against a rush to overturn precedents, while Clarence Thomas suggested older decisions that are in fact wrong should be changed.
We should welcome this debate because it highlights the judiciary’s duty to correct its own mistakes and to ensure that our constitutional rights are properly and fully protected.
Refusing to employ or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as race, religion, or gender is referred to as workplace ratification.
<h3>Ratification</h3>
Ratify means to authorize or enact a legally binding act that would not otherwise be critical in the absence of such permission. In the constitutional context, countries may ratify an modification to an existing/adoption of a new constitution.
Ratification describes the international act whereby a state signifies its consent to be attached to a treaty if the parties intended to show their approval by such an act.
To learn more about ratification visit the link-
brainly.com/question/23842955
#SPJ4
