<u>The purpose of the new mandatory discovery provisions is to: remove the element of surprise from litigation. make litigation more of a quest for the truth. minimize discovery times and costs</u>
Explanation:
<u>Discovery </u>refers to the process of exchanging the information between the parties involved in a trial.The prosecution and the defense build their respective cases based on the evidences available.The information exchanged includes
- Physical evidences
- Witness statement
- Police interrogation data
- List of the witnesses
The biggest change to the Discovery provision is
- Earlier the defense has to file a written request to obtain the evidences and also no time frame was set to provide the evidences to the defense.So in many cases the prosecutor used to keep the evidences in their custody till the eve of the trial.
- But as per the new discovery provision,the prosecutor has to provide the defense all the information/evidences within 15 days of the arrangement.The time frame can be extended to 30 days in case the evidence for the trial is large,or the prosecutor does not have evidence in their possession.
The answer is (D) all of the above
I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
Answer: Democracy allows people to choose their leaders and the leaders get the powers to run the government.
Explanation:
The peaceful transfer of power is considered important in democracy. In this the powers or leadership is smoothly handed over to the newly elected or selected members of the population. This results after the election or the during transmission of powers to different political regime.
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1