This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Answer:
Both Martin Luther King Jr. and John Kerry opposed the Vietnam War because they both, along with millions of other Americans, thought it was immoral thing to do.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Comment
I think the best answer is D. If you look at an event by considering the social, economic, political, and religious backgrounds, you may come to realize why the event took place.
That reason given for D is the definition of of Historical Contextualization is the background circumstances that influenced the event taking place.
I had this before I'm pretty sure its D
