It’s likely that evidence will be destroyed by the subject is the correct answer
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer: b
Explanation:
unless they’ve detained the suspect prior and have a reason to suspect he/she has these weapons or he gave them consent to enter and the weapons were in plain sight they wrongfully entered
Answer:
No this was not the case for me and I was not aware that it was a good idea to have the opportunity to speak to the
Answer:
True they are not considered protected speech.
Explanation:
