Answer: (MAKE ME BRAINLIST PLEASE)
Meso-America and the Andes were the two habitats of progress in America.
Meso-American human advancements had paper and a pictorial content from a beginning phase.
In Meso-America the Maya human advancement gained the best ground in science and innovation. Among its advancements were the position-esteem number framework with nothing, the improvement of the most exact known calendar,the development of elastic and the corbelled curve.
The Aztec entered the locale as hero travelers and absorbed a large part of the current human advancements. They set up a government funded educational system and proceeded with the Maya convention of galactic perception.
In the Andean locale the Inca set up a domain that came to from Ecuador to Santiago de Chile.
The strength of the Inca domain was thoughtful designing (street and scaffold development), social administration and plant development.
The locale of the South Pacific isn't helpful for the improvement of civic establishments. Science in the South Pacific was confined to route across the high oceans, in which the islanders dominated.
1. Americans were concerned about the influence and power of big business monopolies.
2. Americans were worried about quality of life.
3. Americans were concerned about finances.
4. Americans were optimistic about the future.
I think it was B because they detained them after the war because the Japanese got beat badly & they thought they would want revenge<span />
Facism and Nazism developed out of a general crisis of the European political system connected with the rise of the mass participation state from the late nineteenth century to the end of World War I. The mass participation state was marked by five features: an unprecedented expansion of the number of voters brought on by universal manhood suffrage and in some cases by the extension of the vote to women; the development of mass communications; a high degree of mass mobilization, initially by revolutionary socialist parties; new economic and social demands put forward by democratic and revolutionary organizations; and fragmented, poorly organized middle-class political party structures, largely legacies of the nineteenth-century restricted franchise. Fascism was motivated by deep-seated fears of social and political disintegration and of political revolution on the part of both ruling elites and large sectors of the middle and lower-middle classes. These classes had little to gain from a socialist revolution. Fascist and Nazi movements appeared throughout Europe during the period between World Wars I and II, but only in Italy and Germany did they come to power and develop into regimes.
