1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ollegr [7]
3 years ago
13

What was the effect of the French and Indian war being very costly?

History
2 answers:
Nataly_w [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Britain was in heavy debt

Explanation:

vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Fighting the French and Indian War was very expensive for the British government. It had borrowed money and needed to pay it back. The British had gained a lot of land from the French in North America, including many forts. After the war, they stationed British soldiers in the former French forts, which was expensive.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How does the U.S. system of government reflect a commitment to the principle of limited government? (5 points) a Defining power
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

D: Ensuring political power rests with the people.

Hope this helped c;

5 0
3 years ago
Was the revolution in agriculture necessary to the Industrial Revolution? Explain.
pantera1 [17]
In general, no, the revolution in agriculture was no necessary to the Industrial Revolution since the Industrial Revolution relied on things like machines and steel.
8 0
3 years ago
Which statements are true about the magna Carta
almond37 [142]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

6 0
2 years ago
How did government grants to build railroads result in large-scale corruption.
Scilla [17]
It is always money that causes corruption. I am betting that as they gave out the grant those that were profiting bribed and blackmailed those that were in the government. And as they grew more powerful they started to become the top boss of the place. As they grow more powerful they grow more wealthy. With more wealth their power extends even more. 
6 0
3 years ago
What crop was in high demand during 1500-1700?
Murrr4er [49]
I think Oats, rye and corn.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which major mathematical idea did the Aztecs develop? A.a numbering system based on 20 B.a counting system of three symbols C&gt
    14·2 answers
  • After the Revolution, the practice of enslaving African Americans was
    13·2 answers
  • Mark the results world war one led to in the United States
    11·1 answer
  • Which events showed that America was heading into war?
    6·1 answer
  • MARKING AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Where did slavery exist in colonial America?
    5·2 answers
  • As the population shifts , how would the number of electors change?
    7·2 answers
  • Read the scenario and answer the question that follows: Miguel is at a restaurant he has never eaten at before. He reads through
    9·1 answer
  • I got it wrong so pls help
    11·1 answer
  • The Munich Pact did which of the
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!