Answer:
protect against one branch dominating
Explanation:
To prevent the government from becoming the tyrannical, the founding fathers believed that they need to implement a system that can overrule government officials at any time. The system of checks and balance is one of the method that they do to achieve this.
Currently, American government is divided into three branches. Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branch.
Our current system provide each Branch with the power to intervene with the decisions made in other branches. (For example, the legislative branch want to pass a law that is unconstitutional, the judicial branch could prevent it through the judicial review process)
The correct answer is Confirmation Bias.
Confirmatory Bias or also known as Confirmation Bias is defined as the propensity to scan for, translation, support, and review data in a way that affirms one's prior convictions or speculations. Since, people who believe in horoscopes tend to give focus on events that are consistent with the prediction given to them, which is why they are considered to be an example of Confirmation Bias.
The two expressions that are equivalent to <span>10-9(2-6a) are</span>: 2(27 a - 4) and 54a - 8.
The quote above <u>describes the section of a state government that makes the laws</u>. This section, more commonly called "body" or "branch," refers to the legislature of the State of Florida. The quote indeed describes the structure of the legislature of a State. In the U.S., all 50 states have legislatures, and all of them, except for Nebraska, have a bicameral Congress consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives; Furthermore, besides passing legislation, state legislatures also have other governing functions such as approving a state's budget and initiating tax legislation and articles of impeachment.
The parole officer could only initiate revocation if
1. If the parolee is not available on the day of the Board hearing
2. If the parolee is sentenced by the Federal Court
His authority is limited to the judges as parole hearing officers. The judges could hear or ignore the recommendations made by the parole officer when they see fit. However, this power of initiating revocation is very crucial and must not be taken lightly and for granted.
