<h3>
Answer: Choice D) Not enough information</h3>
===================================================
Explanation:
We are given that AB is parallel to DC.
This allows us to say that angle BAC = angle DCA because they are alternate interior angles.
We have one pair of congruent angles, but we don't have a second pair of congruent angles. So we cannot use ASA.
We can't use SAS either since we only have information about one pair of congruent sides (AC = AC). We don't know anything about the other sides.
AA is not a congruence theorem. Instead it's a similarity theorem. So we can rule this out as well.
The only thing left is choice D. We don't have enough information. We need to know if AD is parallel to BC, so we can show that angle BCA = angle DAC, which is the other angle pair to use ASA. Or if we knew that AB = CD, then we could use SAS to prove the triangles congruent. Unfortunately we don't have this information.
The amount of the substance (At) at any time t is calculated through the equation,
At = (A0)(e^-kt)
where A0 is the initial amount and k is constant.
For the half-life,
ln (At / A0) = ln 0.5 = -k(5270 years)
The value of k is 1.3153x10^-4 / year.
Substituting this value to the same equation, where At = 0.25A0
ln 0.25 = -(1.3153 x 10^-4)(t)
The value of t from this equation is 10540 years. The closest value to this is letter A.
Sine and cosine (and trigonometric functions in general) are used extensively in physics, and neither really has priority - it depends on the particular problem you're working on. Is there a particular problem that prompted your question?
Answer:
7×+14=56
= 7×=56 -14
= × = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope it helps you
Recall the values of the trigonometric functions at the required angles:
So, the number -4 can be thought of as