The question of whether Sterling Cooper and Co.’s <em>application process </em>is problematic under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is:
- A. No, Sterling Cooper and Co.’s application process likely does not raise concerns Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
<h3>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act</h3>
This refers to the clause within the Civil Rights Act which prohibits employers from discriminating prospective workers on the grounds of their race, color, religion, gender or country.
With this in mind, we can see that Sterling Cooper and Co made use of an application process which had to do with checking if the prospective employee has been convicted of a felony. This does not violate the Civil Rights Act Title VII in any way.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A
Read more about Civil Rights Act here:
brainly.com/question/10584148
Answer: Control and Accountability
Explanation: When centralized leaders are in charge of all major decisions they retain more control over company operations and development of its culture. Additionally, little question exists over who is accountable for the results of those decisions. If the company gets a bad price in a supplier negotiation, top managers know to turn to the head buyer to get a sense of what went wrong. This accountability causes top managers to drive each other to peak performance.
Answer:
General Deterrence
Explanation:
Deterrence is of two types including:
1. General deterrence.
2. Specific deterrence.
General deterrence: The term general deterrence is defined as the process that is being designed to stop or prevent various crimes in a general population. In this scenario, this creates is a huge impact on people related to the legal punishment threat because the person involved in any illegal thing shall be punished in public in a way to humiliate the person. Hence, the other person who sees this will be scared of doing similar crimes.
In the question above, the statement signifies the "general deterrence".
