A. Job Shadowing I just took the test and i put intern so it has to be A
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Answer:
Conflict theorist
Explanation:
Conflict theorist interprete a society as in equal due to fierce competition based on materialistic perception such as money properties and basic infrastructure
Answer:Observational learning
Explanation:
Observational learning, this is how we learn when we observe others do things so that later we can actual imitate their behaviour or model their behaviour and emotional expressions
Some people may also learn from someone's behavior but not really imitate it in the future. According to psychologist there are certain ways that are followed for the observed behavior to successful, these are attention ,retention, reproduction and motivation.
Conditions for observational learning
Attention
- for someone to learn a behavior they need to actual pay attention to what is being done by their model otherwise if there are factors distracting that person it won't be easy to learn the behavior.
Retention means one need to actual keep the behavior in their kind and be able to remember it in the future
Reproduction and motivation is dependent on the fact that if the behaviour is rewarded one is likely to imitate it but if it is punished they are likely to reject it.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
For the ethical researcher, the major problem with deception is that it tends to involve direct attacks on other people’s consent.
And of course, that is not ethical and professional researchers and companies shouldn't ever do that.
Researchers need to be very honest and clear about the purpose of research, the instruments used, the risks -if there are any- and the way results are going to be used.
Researchers also have to get the written consent from the people that are going to be part of the study. This way, participants are going to be aware of any details.
