Answer:
1/3 I think I did the math and if that's not right try 1/3:1/4 (<--ratio)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a. Yes. This provides convincing evidence that the true proportion of all attendees who ate the fish that got sick (80%) is more than the true proportion of all attendees who did not eat the fish that got sick.
b. The mistake here would have been the rejection of the Doctor's theory or hypothesis to the effect that more attendees who ate the fish got sick than those who did not eat the fish. This is a Type 1 error. A Type 1 error occurs when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. On the other hand, a Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it should be rejected. While a Type I error is equivalent to a false positive, a Type II error is equivalent to a false negative.
Step-by-step explanation:
Total number of attendees who ordered fish = 1,000
Sample size of the attendees who ate fish = 80
Number of attendees who ate the fish and got sick = 64 (80% or 64/80)
Sample size of attendees who did not eat fish = 60
Number of attendees who did not eat fish and got sick = 39 (65% or 39/60)
18.5•40=740
40•1.5=60
60•5.5=330
740+330=1070
A: $1070
Answer:
The correct solution is "7.3%".
Step-by-step explanation:
It seems that the given question is incomplete. Find below the attachment of the complete and appropriate query.
According to the question,
The total married couples are,
= 55,550,000
where,
Both native = 79.5%
Both foreign = 13.2%
Now,
The percentage of couple that is one native as well as one foreign will be:
= 
= 
(%)
Sometimes complex information all at once can be hard to gather... Simplifying ideas and concepts can help with the amount of cramming you're giving to your audience.
You're answer is B. Simplify ideas and concepts. :)
